In meaningful conversation, speaking and listening both help achieve the same objective—shared understanding.  

Speaking can be thought of as activity and listening as receptivity. Energy is externalized while speaking and internalized while listening. Both involve the flow of energy and information, and differ only in the direction of the flow.

Healing the wounds of our age requires engagement in meaningful conversations. We can reconcile the conflicting visions of reality represented by polarized masculinity or femininity, which may manifest both in conflict between the sexes and mental health problems. Let’s examine some neurological research and a novel that deal with mental health and gender, beginning with this concept—the Baha’i teachings affirm that the soul has no gender:

Sex, in its relation to the exigencies of the physical plane, has no connection with the Spirit. In this age of spiritual awakening, the world has entered upon the path of progress into the arena of development, where the power of the spirit surpasses that of the body. Soon the spirit will have dominion over the world of humanity. – Abdu’l-Baha, Abdu’l-Baha in London, p. 81.

From a Baha’i perspective, there is no difference between the inner spiritual reality of any human being, whether outwardly male or female. Of course, this doesn’t mean that gender is unimportant. Perhaps gender may be seen as the difference in the flow of energy shaped by our physical bodies—men’s bodies direct attention outward, women’s bodies direct attention inward. That gender is associated with how we direct our energies, is now emerging theory in scientific research and the study of autism.

Dr. Simon Baron-Cohen

Dr. Simon Baron-Cohen

The APA’s Journal of Abnormal Psychology, as well as a growing body of literature in social work, report that men tend to externalize emotional energy and women tend to internalize it. Conditions relating to an inward focus like depression are more common in women, and those with an outward focus are more common in men. Research from Dr. Simon Baron-Cohen, a British neurologist focusing on gender of the mind and autism, describes autism spectrum conditions (ASC) with his “extreme male brain theory.”

Dr. Baron-Cohen’s research suggests that men’s brains tend to systemize or seek lawful patterns in the external world, while women’s brains tend to empathize with or guess at the internal realities of others’ thought and feeling. According to this theory the autistic brain is called the extreme male brain, because it excels at systemizing but struggles with empathy.

Another notable aspect of Baron-Cohen’s research is his description of this systemizing capacity of the autistic brain as truth-seeking. He says that the autistic mind is well adapted for scientific inquiry into patterns (some of the greatest scientists of our time have autistic or Asperger’s-like characteristics). He suggests:

…if ‘truth’ is defined as lawful patterns in data then, according to the hypersystemizing theory, people with ASC are strongly driven to discover the ‘truth’… their difficulties with empathy are the result of a mind that is seeks the truth in a domain (emotions) that is not very lawful. The truth of another’s feelings is ultimately unknowable and requires representing multiple, different perspectives on reality, rather than a single truth. – Baron-Cohen, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2008, 61 (1), 64–75.

This research seems to imply that masculinity attunes us externally to the objective; femininity attunes us internally to the subjective. Harvard neurologist Dr. Martha Herbert argues that autism can’t be understood as an object in itself, but rather autism may be understood as the electromagnetic de-tuning of the organism in relation to its environment. We can see from these modern examples, as well as traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture, and a variety of martial arts, the concept that sickness signals an energy imbalance and equilibrium results in health.

Given that imbalance is present in our culture, what would it mean to move towards greater balance? In the next post in this series, let’s consider how to shift our culture towards health and balance.

The opinions and views expressed in this article are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of BahaiTeachings.org or any institution of the Baha’i Faith.

6 Comments

characters remaining
  • Jan 11, 2017
    Here's a link to Baron-Cohen's empathizing vs. systemizing personality test: http://personality-testing.info/tests/EQSQ.php see where you fall
  • Lorine Dolin-James
    Jan 02, 2017
    Intrigued and look forward to future in depth posts.
  • Kewan Falahi Firouzi
    Jan 01, 2017
    Thanks Tim, very interesting to know about that perspective on autism theory. When reading the first line about meaningful conversation, I was wondering is shared understanding purely achieved by listening and speaking? What are the ways that the listener and speaker connect with each other? I imagine if the role of a listener is purely passive, and the speaker purely active, not much shared understanding can be achieved. What are the way to connect? The passive force and active force.
    • Jan 02, 2017
      Hi Kewan, thanks for your comment; appreciate the subtlety you're getting at and think it would be worth exploring. Recently came across another blog's post that is related, you might enjoy it too. Unfortunately can't post the link, but you can google "Bahaiblog giving receiving light"
    • Jan 02, 2017
      Hi Kewan, thanks for your comment; appreciate the subtlety you're getting at and think it would be worth exploring. Recently came across another blog's post that is related (bahaiblog.net/site/2016/10/thoughts-giving-receiving-light), you might enjoy it too.
    • Jan 02, 2017
      Hi Kewan, thanks for your comment; appreciate the subtlety you're getting at and think it would be worth exploring. Recently came across another blog's post that is related, you might appreciate it: http://bahaiblog.net/site/2016/10/thoughts-giving-receiving-light/