Inspired
by the
Baha’i Faith
The views expressed in our content reflect individual perspectives and do not represent authoritative views of the Baha'i Faith. The official website of the Baha'i Faith is: Bahai.org. The official website of the Baha'is of the United States can be found here: Bahai.us.
GOT IT
The views expressed in our content reflect individual perspectives and do not represent the authoritative views of the Baha'i Faith.
How do I become Baha’i?
Life

Spiritual and Material Happiness: What’s the Difference?

David Langness | Jun 21, 2017

PART 1 IN SERIES Answering a Reader's Question

The views expressed in our content reflect individual perspectives and do not represent the authoritative views of the Baha'i Faith.

Interested in Other Topics?

We’ve got something for everyone.
David Langness | Jun 21, 2017

PART 1 IN SERIES Answering a Reader's Question

The views expressed in our content reflect individual perspectives and do not represent the authoritative views of the Baha'i Faith.

One of the joys of editing and writing for BahaiTeachings.org: the delightful, fascinating, insightful questions we get from our readers.

Like this one: “I consider myself a religious person in faith, but I’m not monk-like in my devotion. I’ve always thought that spiritual happiness didn’t have to replace non-religious happiness. Is it alright to not live life devoted to religion, even though I still feel like I have strong faith?”

What a thoughtful, heartfelt and wonderful question, I first thought when I read it.

The reader then went on to elaborate: “Some context to this is that reading holy texts has proved overwhelming for me whenever I have in the past, leading to me giving my copy of the Bible to my library. By that I mean I am much happier when I don’t read the Bible or such holy texts, but I still consider myself a man of faith if not selfless devotion, and I still pray at least twice a day, is this acceptable?”

Wow. See what I mean? The questions we get at BahaiTeachings come straight from the heart and soul, often at the very deepest and most reflective level of human thought, imagination and spiritual search. I feel truly privileged to have the bounty of receiving such heartfelt questions, since their sincerity and soulfulness touch my heart, too. So I’ll devote this series of essays to trying my best to answer some of those questions, as long as I can emphatically issue a major disclaimer first: I’m no authority!

chile-temple-roof

That’s because the Baha’i Faith has no clergy—no priests, pastors, imams, rabbis, gurus or popes. In fact, the Baha’i Faith vests absolutely no power or authority in any one believer. The entire leadership of the Baha’i Faith is democratically elected, at the local, national and international level—and is composed of bodies of nine people, who make their decisions jointly, never ceding their ultimate decision-making authority to any individual member. No one can interpret the Baha’i teachings in any authoritative way except the central figures of the Faith—the Bab, its herald and forerunner; Baha’u’llah, its prophet and founder; Abdu’l-Baha, the center of its covenant and exemplar; and Shoghi Effendi, its Guardian. My personal opinion is worth exactly the same as the personal opinion of any other Baha’i—no more, no less.

That’s why, at BahaiTeachings.org, we always place a strong disclaimer at the end of every article, saying “The opinions and views expressed in this article are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of BahaiTeachings.org or any institution of the Baha’i Faith.” We mean it, too. Our standard disclaimer isn’t there, like it is in so many other places, to satisfy legal requirements—it’s there because the Baha’i teachings say clearly that no individual Baha’i can ever claim any authority:

A clear distinction is, however, drawn in the Baha’i Writings between authoritative interpretation and the understanding that each individual arrives at from a study of its Teachings. Individual interpretations based on a person’s understanding of the Teachings constitute the fruit of man’s rational power and may well contribute to a greater comprehension of the Faith. Such views, nevertheless, lack authority. – The Universal House of Justice, in Baha’u’llah’s Most Holy Book, p. 221.

So, as always here on this site, I’ll present my personal views in the hope that they can make a small contribution to our collective knowledge about the Baha’i teachings—with the insistent caveat that they’re just my views, and that you’re equally entitled to form and express your own, based on your independent understanding of the Baha’i teachings. That’s part of the beauty of being a Baha’i:

Let us also remember that at the very root of the Cause lies the principle of the undoubted right of the individual to self-expression, his freedom to declare his conscience and set forth his views. – Shoghi Effendi, Baha’i Administration, pp. 63-64.

You’ve no doubt noticed, if you read BahaiTeachings.org regularly, that we have many different voices here expressing their own opinions about the Baha’i teachings. We do that on purpose, constantly inviting and recruiting more people as contributors, because we want a wide variety of opinions, input and observations from a diverse range of writers and speakers.

After that very long disclaimer, let’s go back to our regular programming, and think about that profound question we received from a reader. Here it is again: “I consider myself a religious person in faith, but I’m not monk-like in my devotion. I’ve always thought that spiritual happiness didn’t have to replace non-religious happiness. Is it alright to not live life devoted to religion, even though I still feel like I have strong faith?”

I think I’d like to start answering that deep question with a few of Abdu’l-Baha’s startling definitions of happiness and joy:

True happiness depends on spiritual good and having the heart ever open to receive the Divine Bounty. – Abdu’l-Baha, Paris Talks, p. 109.

No matter how far the material world advances, it cannot establish the happiness of mankind. Only when material and spiritual civilization are linked and coordinated will happiness be assured. – Abdu’l-Baha, The Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 109.

… all the sorrow and the grief that exist come from the world of matter — the spiritual world bestows only the joy!

If we suffer it is the outcome of material things, and all the trials and troubles come from this world of illusion.

For instance, a merchant may lose his trade and depression ensues. A workman is dismissed and starvation stares him in the face. A farmer has a bad harvest, anxiety fills his mind. A man builds a house which is burnt to the ground and he is straightway homeless, ruined, and in despair.

All these examples are to show you that the trials which beset our every step, all our sorrow, pain, shame and grief, are born in the world of matter; whereas the spiritual Kingdom never causes sadness. A man living with his thoughts in this Kingdom knows perpetual joy. The ills all flesh is heir to do not pass him by, but they only touch the surface of his life, the depths are calm and serene. – Abdu’l-Baha, Paris Talks, p. 110.

You May Also Like

What Stage of Life are You In?
Life

What Stage of Life are You In?

Can I Vent Without Backbiting?
Life

Can I Vent Without Backbiting?

Moving Past Our Mistakes
Life

Moving Past Our Mistakes


Comments

characters remaining
  • Jun 21, 2017
    -
    I too consider myself a religious person of faith, but I don't consider it as my most important identity. I do set apart time for meditation and reading holy texts, but I always think I can do more. I do read holy texts. It is limited to the good stuff parts, not the more controversial parts. Buddhist sutras (Lotus Sutra especially) are the only thing I don't read in this redacted or best of selections form. The context is I don't like moralistic busbodyness associated with being very religious. While I may be able to follow all the norms and ...laws of any religion, I don't want society to force others to. Moralistic passages are why I have trouble reading Abrahamic texts other than in redacted selections form. Why does moralism exist?
    Read more...
    • Jun 21, 2017
      -
      Hello, Melanie. I meant the highlights section of Skeptic's Annotated Bible/Quran/Book of Mormon as well as the Best/Worst of Bible/Quran/Book of Mormon/Bhagavad Gita/Buddhist Sutras section of The Jefferson Bible for the Twenty First Century. I'm back late because I was reading the Rationak Wiki article on the Skeptic's Annotated Bible and got sidetracked by all the apologetics and counter-apologetics template articles too. I made no reference to the laws of the religions, but the specifically literally in the books laws. Laws (divine commas theory) are subject to the euthyphro dilemma, authenticity of religion/revelation, and interpretations thereof. Example: Quran mandates amputating ...thieves. Bible, executing MSMs.
      Read more...
    • Melanie Black
      Jun 21, 2017
      -
      Stephen, hello. As I understand it (as a Baha'i), there is a difference between man-made religious laws and the laws that the Prophet Himself prescribes to humanity at the time of His appearance in history. If we were to look at present examples, we might find that more fundamentalist forms of any religion (be it Christianity or Muslim), have very rigorous and moralistic laws forbidding people to listen to music, or dance, or forbid women to drive cars, etc. These kinds of "laws" have nothing to do with the laws of Christ or Muhammed who taught concepts such as love, ...or times to pray. A prophet of God brings laws for the purpose of benefiting humanity. If I had more room I would explain this further. But this is the gist of it.
      Read more...
x
Connect with Baha’is in your area
Connect with Baha’is in your area
Get in touch with the Baha’is in your community.