Do you think of yourself as a globalist or a nationalist? If you’re not sure, take this simple quiz to find out:

  1. How do you feel about national borders? Should they be:
    1. Sealed, policed and generally impenetrable?
    2. De-emphasized and more easily crossed?
  2. If you decided to fly a flag at your home, would you choose:
    1. The flag of your country?
    2. A flag with a photo of the Earth from space?
  3. Do you think of yourself as a citizen:
    1. Of the nation you live in?
    2. Of the world?

Pretty obvious, isn’t it? If you answered “a.” to these three questions, you’re probably a nationalist; and if you answered “b.” you’re more likely a globalist. All of these questions basically come down to one central emotional one: what do you love and feel loyal to more, your country or the Earth?

But before we go any further with this kind of categorization, let’s define our terms—or at least let Webster’s Dictionary do it for us:

naˊtionˑalˑism  n. 1. devotion to one’s nation, patriotism

globˊalˑism  n. 1. a policy, outlook, etc., that is worldwide in scope

diverse-handsSeems simple, doesn’t it? Well, it may seem that way, but the stark choice between nationalism and globalism has become a major flash point in the planet’s complex political life lately. In many if not most countries around the world, a fierce debate rages: should we do what’s best for our country, or what’s best for the world? Should we care more about the citizens of our own nation, or everyone, regardless of where they were born? Should we privilege those who are citizens, or should we de-emphasize national citizenship in favor of a more inclusive view of all people as world citizens? Should we retain our national identities as Spaniards, Russians, Brazilians, Liberians, Americans—or should we adopt a more universal, global identity that transcends our purely national origins?

Entire elections, policy directions, huge economic expenditures and the lives of billions of people all hinge on these enormously important questions today. Refugee crises, environmental crises and even crises in international relations between countries depend on how we answer them.

Tremendous forces are at work in the world in favor of each position. Nationalist forces still dominate planetary political structures, and the so-called “developed” nations—the most prosperous countries, usually termed the global North, dominate the poorer and “under-developed” nations, termed the global South. Nations from the global North—the United States, Japan, the European Union and Russia, among others—tend to possess more wealth, more power and more influence. Nations from the global South—India, Indonesia, most South American and African countries—tend to have less wealth, less power and less influence, even though they have larger aggregate populations than the developed countries.

Globalist forces, however, increasingly pose a challenge to traditional nationalist views. Because the world has transformed itself during the past century from a vast planet to a neighborhood; because social relations between the Earth’s peoples increasingly cross national borders; because travel and transportation and communication and the diffusion of meanings and values through the internet and popular global culture has increased exponentially; the purely nationalistic concepts of citizenship and patriotism and absolute allegiance to a single country have begun to dwindle.

Baha’is believe that these titanic global changes mark a major turning point in human history. Right now, in this century, we are in the midst of a pivotal alteration in the way we see ourselves and the world—and that alteration will have an enormous impact on the future of the human race.

All humanity, the Baha’i teachings say, must eventually unify under one banner—the banner of global unity:

We desire but the good of the world and the happiness of the nations…. That all nations should become one in faith and all men as brothers; that the bonds of affection and unity between the sons of men should be strengthened… Yet so it shall be; these fruitless strifes, these ruinous wars shall pass away, and the ‘Most Great Peace’ shall come…. Yet do We see your kings and rulers lavishing their treasures more freely on means for the destruction of the human race than on that which would conduce to the happiness of mankind…. These strifes and this bloodshed and discord must cease, and all men be as one kindred and one family…. Let not a man glory in this, that he loves his country; let him rather glory in this, that he loves his kind…. – Baha’u’llah, The Proclamation of Baha’u’llah, p. 1.

So in this series of essays, we’ll examine the contemporary battle between nationalism and globalism, and explore the Baha’i teachings on the subject. We’ll look at what the Baha’i teachings envision for a unified, post-nationalistic world, and see what they mean when they call for the unity of all nations in one global system of governance. Mostly, though, we’ll elucidate the reasons why you should privilege your love of humanity over your love of country, and why the Earth’s future depends on us all becoming globalists.

The opinions and views expressed in this article are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of or any institution of the Baha’i Faith.


characters remaining
  • B.E. Stanton
    Aug 17, 2017
    I feel that globalism is a false front for unity.
  • Steve Eaton
    Feb 01, 2017
    Open minds and common sense
    would lead to the right balance,
    I think. If we are guided by a general
    love of man and respect for the environment, all the economic and
    political framework would take shape
    to fit. Global consciousness would
    lead to global justice; good
    stewardship of resources would
    encourage local self-sufficiency.
    Then everybody's rights would be
    ensured and the Earth protected.
  • Walison Silva
    Jan 31, 2017
    Family unity
    Tribe unity
    City-State unity
    Country unity
    Global unity
    We've all the time been learning how to live together in its level and seems to be very difficult for the human kind to learn.
    • Brandon Williford
      Sep 02, 2017
      Globalism would ruin all nations. You wanna know why? Because without nationalism there would be no country, and the government would have one, global, infinite power.
  • Jan 30, 2017
    Globalism has multiple meanings - spiritual, political, economic. "Globalism" is widely taken to mean unregulated, predatory capitalism across national boundaries. The term "New World Order" is often taken to mean the same thing. We have to be careful with the terms we use, to avoid being conflated with that kind of ideology.
  • Chris Cobb
    Jan 30, 2017
    The spiritual globalism of the Baha'i faith is very distinct from political globalism.
    • Hooshang S. Afshar
      Feb 01, 2017
      I think future global unity would be similar to current European Unity in its infancy.